International
News
- March 2006
Moscow , February 2, 2006 (UPI) -- The guards of Moscow
's Kremlin Regiment are trading in their traditional felt
and sheepskin for cold-weather uniforms based on space-age
technology.
The guards, whose responsibility includes the protection
of high-level officials and the Kremlin itself, spend many
hours outside, sometimes in winter temperatures as low
as minus 25 Celsius (minus 13 Fahrenheit).
The guards' traditional "valenki," or felt
boots, as well as their sheepskin hats and overcoats, are
being replaced by modern wear made from special water-resistant
fabrics and lined with thermoplastic fibers originally
developed for spacesuits, Russian news agency RIA Novosti
reported Wednesday.
"The outerwear's fabric possesses unique properties.
It can withstand strong winds, snow, freezing temperatures
and rain. The special membrane fabric is almost 100 percent
waterproof. Tests have shown it will resist water for more
than 500 hours," said Sergei Devyatov, spokesman for
the Federal Guard Service, of which the Kremlin Regiment
is part.
The uniform's designers resisted the temptation to dress
the regiment in spacesuit silver, however, and kept the
regiment's historical colors of emerald green and cornflower
blue.
Mexico , January 31, 2006 (Emerging Textiles) - Mexico
's apparel and textile producers have clearly been suffering
in 2005. Latest figures confirm lower shipments to the
US in a year dominated by trade tussles with China . The
industry is in a panic and has been hemorrhaging jobs in
a bid to reduce production costs while also losing out
to Asia in restricted China categories.
Mexico 's apparel exports to the US have declined in
2005 under pressure from soaring Chinese shipments.
Total volume of apparel shipments en route to the US
has fallen 10 per cent in the year to November with notable
decreases in several larger bulk categories such as women's
cotton trousers (348).
This has created panic within both the industry and government
circles on how to adapt and successfully formulate a plan
to retain US market shares.
Since 1994, Mexico had relied upon close market ties
with both Canada and the US as part of the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
However, this only gave Mexico a short-lived advantage
and, following China 's breakthrough into world commerce,
such benefits accorded by NAFTA have since been eroded.
The balance of trade between Mexico and China is also
extremely unequal. In 2004, Mexico bought US$14 billion
worth of Chinese produce with only US$400 million going
the other way.
Slowly, Mexico has begun to evolve a strategy to counteract
the emerging Chinese by focusing on certain areas in the
US market while at the same time applying high duties to
protect its industry.
The country's textile and apparel industry is the key
indicator in the challenging new post-quota world that
has seen a vicious increase in shipments from China in
the past twelve months.
35 per cent of jobs in the industry have been lost due
to such elevated direct competition in the US market that
was previously deemed to be Mexico 's natural place.
It is not merely that factories have been closing down
or going bust, but rather due to large sackings of workers
as producers attempt to save on labor costs.
Workers in China demand around a quarter of a Mexican
wage and this has fuelled into the price cuts seen in 2005
for Chinese apparel and textile products.
CAFTA, the Central American Free Trade Agreement, could
provide Mexican textiles with a ray of hope.
Under the agreement's rules of origin, exporters from
the signatory countries are allowed to use yarn from any
of the three NAFTA member nations and still qualify for
duty free access in the US .
However, most agree that quotas imposed by the US over
three years on Chinese apparel will not be enough to save
Mexico 's industry as it competes with other Asian low
cost producers.
Countries such as Vietnam , Cambodia and Bangladesh ,
for example, have been gaining in areas subject to restrictions
while the part of the market once enjoyed by Mexico has
been declining. And with China 's ability to severely reduce
unit values, Mexico has been virtually priced out of the
US market.
Melbourne , Australia , February 15, 2006 (Green Left
Weekly) - Angry members of the United Firefighters Union
(UFU) yesterday marched to Victoria 's Parliament House
steps to protest the stalling by the Metropolitan Fire
and Emergency Services Board (MFB) on negotiations over
a new enterprise bargaining agreement. They were especially
angry that the MFB has refused to offer Victorian firefighters
safe uniforms for fighting fires.
UFU members employed by the Country Fire Authority also
joined the protest, as it appears that the CFA will take
a similarly intransigent attitude to the MFB.
The depth of anger at the MFB's disregard for the safety
of firefighters was reflected by the high turnout of firefighters
at the rally. Two-thirds of firefighters available to attend
turned up. Many came straight from night shift to the rally.
Firefighters from both the MFB and CFA are angry that
the new uniforms being offered do not meet Australian safety
standards.
UFU state secretary Peter Marshall told the firefighters
that Victoria has “the worst equipment in Australia ”.
He accused the fire services of hiding test results on
the new uniforms, which are cheaper than the safer alternatives.
A Queensland fire safety officer, Mark Gribble, told
the protest that every state except for South Australia
could benefit from having better protective clothing. He
agreed that Victoria had the most unsafe uniforms. He said
that firefighters in other countries had much better protective
clothing than in Australia .
“Why do we need a moisture barrier in our uniforms?”,
asked Gribble. “Because two of our colleagues died
as a result of these uniforms. Victorian firefighter gear
fails all international standards. We need uniforms with
a moisture barrier.”
UFU national executive officer Leigh Hubbard told the
workers that the MFB runs at a surplus and could easily
afford to provide safe uniforms. He told the rally that
the MFB was stalling on the EBA to force the union to negotiate
under the new Work Choices legislation when it comes in
March.
Marshall said, “Those making decisions don't know
what it's like to go into a fire and fight a fire, so how
can they make decisions for us?” He added: “If
[Labor Premier] Steve Bracks and his cabinet mates had
to go into a burning building, they'd have the good uniform.”
Unless the safety issue is resolved, thousands of firefighters
are expected to march to parliament on March 8.
|